Approval gates
Mark the actions that need a person. The agent suspends and waits, up to a window you set.
For the work you cannot draw as a flowchart. Give an agent an objective and the tools, and it decides what to do next, shows you its reasoning, and stops for you on anything that matters.
Every step it takes is recorded, including the ones it decided against.
Every morning, find the accounts that stopped using us last month and tell me which are worth a call.
Contracts over 50k with an open complaint. Want me to book time with the owners?
On its own, a model can write. Connected to your systems, an agent can find the record, check the invoice, update the sheet and tell the customer. You decide exactly which doors it has keys to.
You choose which of these each agent may touch.
Point the agent at your policies, contracts, manuals and past tickets. It searches them by meaning, answers from what it finds, and attaches the source so anyone can check.
Can a reseller in Germany return opened goods after 21 days?
No. Resellers have 14 days for opened goods, and only when the seal is intact. Consumers have 30. The exception is a documented fault, which has no time limit.
Answers come from documents you uploaded, with the source attached. If your own material does not cover it, the agent says so rather than inventing a policy.
The question is never whether an agent can act. It is what happens the day it gets something wrong.
Mark the actions that need a person. The agent suspends and waits, up to a window you set.
Read why it chose a step, what it found and what it ruled out.
It can only touch what you granted. Nothing discovers itself along the way.
Pick per step. Whichever model ran is recorded with the run.
Cap spend and step counts so an agent cannot run away with a task.
When it is genuinely unsure, it asks a question rather than guessing.
Approvals do not scatter across inboxes. They land in one place with the context attached, and you approve, edit or reject. Editing is the one people underrate: correct the draft and the agent carries on with your version.
If a person has to read something and decide, that is agent work. If they just follow steps, use a workflow.
Gather from the web and your own files, weigh it up, write the brief a person would have written.
Spot the accounts going quiet, work out which are worth chasing, draft the outreach.
The tickets a script cannot close: read the history, work the problem, escalate what it should.
The invoices that do not match. It investigates, explains the mismatch and proposes the fix.
Follows up until it has an answer, then updates the record and tells you what changed.
A copilot over your policies, contracts and wikis, citing the document every time.
Bring a task your team does by hand and we will point an agent at it, on your data, with you watching every step.